🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.