Skip to content
Daily Today Online

Will Different States Emulate Australia's Lead in Banning Social Platforms for Teenagers Under 16?

Australia's decisive action to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and families are observing intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising group of countries are considering comparable bans.

  • Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our children's childhood". A law could be enacted next year.
  • Norway is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
  • Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "an options on the table".
  • In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to approve a law raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
  • In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
  • The government in The Dutch government has urged families to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a solid starting point," said a leading parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, momentum built behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. An organization established by the loved ones of a young person who died after encountering disturbing social media material contends that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to design tools that are secure and suitable for young users," commented a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, legislation is mostly occurring at the regional level amid federal gridlock.

  • Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
  • Florida has signed a bill prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
  • The state of Virginia has approved a regulation limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra time requiring a guardian's okay.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws requiring guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from various politicians to follow this path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Outside of Europe and the US, additional states are likewise taking action.

  • Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
  • Brazil has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global bodies take a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

While this worldwide discussion evolves, the steps of this nation and several other countries show that states around the world are no longer content to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.

About the author

Jacob King

A seasoned journalist with over a decade of experience covering UK politics and social issues, known for insightful reporting.

Daily Today Online

Type to search articles.